<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Squid &#187; Nonprofit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jcberk.com/blog/category/nonprofit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jcberk.com/blog</link>
	<description>Better communication through technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Newsprint smudges and the nonprofit model</title>
		<link>http://www.jcberk.com/blog/2009/09/16/newsprint-smudges-and-the-nonprofit-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jcberk.com/blog/2009/09/16/newsprint-smudges-and-the-nonprofit-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jcberk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jcberk.com/blog/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was stopped on my walk home today by a gentleman who thought I looked like a person who reads newspapers. We had a friendly conversation: Him: Do you get the Washington Post at home? Me: No, I read it online. Him: We have a new program where you can get a free home subscription [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was stopped on my walk home today by a gentleman who thought I looked like a person who reads newspapers. We had a friendly conversation:<br />
Him: Do you get the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com//">Washington Post</a> at home?<br />
Me: No, I read it online.<br />
Him: We have a new program where you can get a free home subscription to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpostads.com/adsite/what/express/page1273.html">Express [free tabloid sibling of the Post]</a>&#8230;.<br />
Me: Sorry, not interested.<br />
Him: If people don&#8217;t subscribe, there won&#8217;t be an online paper anymore.<br />
Me: But there isn&#8217;t an online subscription.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want the physical version of the paper because I hate newsprint smudges and I like reading articles online (normal procedure: open lots of tabs, read through them in turn). And asking people to pay for online content doesn&#8217;t have a great track record (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/Slate-drops-subscription-fees/2100-1023_3-221631.html">Slate subscriptions</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/18/business/media/18times.html">TimesSelect</a>, etc.), although some organizations have managed it (the Wall Street Journal, Salon Premium, the Financial Times, etc.). But there ought to be <a href="http://delicious.com/jcberk/journalism+businessmodels">something else the Post could ask me</a> besides &#8220;help us kill more trees to get our circulation numbers up.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have a lot of brand loyalty to the Post. I&#8217;ve been reading it pretty much daily since seventh grade, first my parents&#8217; paper subscription and then online when I went to college. I&#8217;m used to the way its writers think &#8211; I know who writes the most <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/14/AR2009091403234.html">entertaining Style stories</a> (<a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/articles/monica+hesse/">Monica Hesse</a>), who consistently likes the opposite movies from me (<a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/articles/ann+hornaday/">Ann Hornaday</a>), whose analysis I trust on the health care debate (<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/">Ezra Klein</a>).</p>
<p>So why don&#8217;t I have a convenient way to support the Post that doesn&#8217;t involve acres of newsprint? I think they&#8217;re still stuck in a commercial model, and wish they&#8217;d adopt a bit of thinking from the nonprofit world &#8211; even if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/28/opinion/28swensen.html">becoming a nonprofit</a> isn&#8217;t the way they choose to go. I already see the benefits of their work, I&#8217;m a supporter, so let me participate in the mission. I can imagine seeing a message one day at the top of the homepage saying &#8220;Following our international stories? Support our foreign bureaus.&#8221; A couple of months after that, I&#8217;d see &#8220;Whether you love the Kennedy Center or the 9:30 Club, support our local arts coverage.&#8221; I&#8217;d give them $20 or $30 every so often, happily. That has to be better for them than the costs of delivering a free Express every weekday. It&#8217;s probably even better than my <a href="https://subscription.washpost.com/subscriberservices/subscriber.portal?state=welcome">paying $1.50 a week for six months for weekdays plus Sunday home delivery of the Post</a>.</p>
<p>The idea isn&#8217;t perfect. First, with advertising costs dependent on subscription numbers and online ads not nearly as lucrative as paper ones, my eyeballs aren&#8217;t as valuable as my blackened fingers. Second, it takes a good bit of effort to run an effective nonprofit fundraising program, and a for-profit fundraising program would require the same message crafting and analysis. Third, especially in a town where so many people are transient, my brand loyalty may be quite the exception.</p>
<p>But some of the blogs I read have Donate buttons in the sidebar, and if the blogger says &#8220;hey, I need help with my car repair / my hospital bill / getting to a conference&#8221; I&#8217;ll probably throw something into the kitty. At the moment the Post can&#8217;t figure out how to ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jcberk.com/blog/2009/09/16/newsprint-smudges-and-the-nonprofit-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
